Climate Change Is Erasing Nations and the World Is Still Looking Away: TheTorres Strait Islanders vs. Australia (UNHRC Case, 2022–2024)
- the Observatory for Human Rights
- Dec 5, 2025
- 3 min read

Rising sea levels are often spoken of as a purely environmental issue, but for many
Pacific Island communities, they are also a fight for cultural survival, dignity, and legal
recognition. The world continues to react with slow diplomacy, even as entire nations
confront the possibility of becoming uninhabitable within a generation. Climate change is no
longer a future threat, but a present human rights emergency, and the international system is
failing to protect those on its frontlines.
On September 22nd, 2022, the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC)
ruled that Australia had violated the rights of the Torres Strait Islanders, Australian nationals,
by failing to take necessary climate action regarding the protection of their homes, sacred
sites, and ways of life (OHCHR, 2022). This landmark decision, further detailed in the
petition Daniel Billy and Others v. Australia (Climate Case Chart, 2022), acknowledged that
climate inaction can directly infringe upon rights to culture, family and life. Yet three years
later, the ruling remains largely symbolic. Rising tides continue to flood ancestral land, erode
cemeteries, and disrupt traditional food systems across the islands.
The Torres Strait case is just one example of a much wider crisis. Communities in
Tuvalu and Kiribati already face saltwater intrusion, loss of arable land, and displacement. In
Tuvalu, the government has warned that parts of the country may become uninhabitable within decades, prompting a historic agreement with Australia to guarantee mobility rights for Tuvaluan citizens affected by climate impacts - the Falepili Union Treaty (DFAT, 2023).
Analyses such as the Center for Global Development’s briefing note underline how
unprecedented and necessary this agreement has become in the face of accelerating
climate risks (CGD, 2024).
Although groundbreaking, the treaty reflects a painful reality:
entire nations may soon face relocation as their only viable adaptation strategy.
The victims are clear: Indigenous and small-island communities whose livelihoods
depend on land, reef systems, and cultural continuity. These communities contribute virtually
nothing to global emissions yet bear disproportionate consequences. The aggressor,
however, is not a single state but a global system built on fossil-fuel dependency, insufficient
mitigation, and decades of delayed action. As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) reiterates, low-lying island states face existential risks unless global
emissions decline rapidly (IPCC, 2023).
International responses remain fragmented and inadequate. While the UNHRC ruling
set an important precedent, it does not compel states to change their policies. The Loss and
Damage Fund, established at COP28, represents progress, but contributions remain
voluntary and insufficient. Human rights organisations such as Amnesty International
highlight the urgent need for wealthy states to create clear pathways for climate-displaced
populations and to treat climate mobility as a matter of protection rather than migration
control (Amnesty International, 2024). Yet no international legal framework currently
guarantees the rights of people displaced by climate impacts.
Local authorities across the Pacific continue to adapt, reinforcing seawalls, adjusting
agricultural practices, and mapping relocation pathways, but these efforts cannot
compensate for global inaction. Without structural change, adaptation will merely delay the
inevitable. The world must recognise that the disappearance of territories also means the
erosion of identity, sovereignty, and rights. A nation cannot simply “move” without losing
something fundamental.
If the international community wishes to uphold the principles of human rights it so
often invokes, it must act decisively. States should commit to rapid emissions reduction,
expand climate finance, and create legal protections for people displaced by climate change.
The case of the Torres Strait Islanders is not an isolated warning; it is the beginning of a
global shift that demands new legal, moral, and political frameworks. The world cannot
continue looking away while entire nations face erasure. Climate justice is an immediate
responsibility and should not be a distant aspiration.
Sources:
ABC News (2022). UN finds Australia violated Torres Strait Islanders' rights by failing to protect them from climate change. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-23/un-finds-australia-violated-torres-strait-islanders-rights/101470524
Al Jazeera (2022). Australia climate change inaction violated islanders’ rights, UN finds. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/23/australia-climate-change-inaction-violated-islanders-rights-un
Amnesty International (2024). Navigating Injustice: Climate Displacement from the Pacific Islands. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org
Center for Global Development (2024). The Australia–Tuvalu Climate and Migration Agreement (Note). Available at: https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/Note-Australia-Tuvalu%20agreement%20note%20v2-LJ-2a.pdf
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2023). Australia–Tuvalu Falepili Union Treaty.
Australian Government. Available at: https://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/tuvalu/australia-tuvalu-falepili-union-treaty
Human Rights Committee (2022). Australia violated Torres Strait Islanders’ rights to enjoy culture and family life. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/09/australia-violated-torres-strait-islanders-rights-enjoy-culture-and-family
Human Rights Committee (2022). Daniel Billy and others v Australia (Torres Strait Islanders petition). Climate Case Chart. Available at: https://www.climatecasechart.com/document/daniel-billy-and-others-v-australia-torres-strait-islanders-petition_191e
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. IPCC. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
Roses in the Ocean (n.d.). Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Communities – Resource Hub. Available at: https://rosesintheocean.com.au/resources-hub/aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-communities/
written by Isadora de Carvalho Alvarez





Comments